The Next Supper

  • the nextsuppersmaillsize.jpg
capitalists poster d.jpg
Detail

Detail

Detail of The Next Supper

Detail of The Next Supper

JP Morgan

JP Morgan

Pro: Before J.P. Morgan, the U.S. faced economic instability, but his support for the gold standard led to industrial growth and global influence. Con: His power over policies favored elites, concentrating control in the hands of a few.

Andrew Carnegie

Andrew Carnegie

Pro: Carnegie’s unmatched contributions to public libraries solidified his role as the leading force behind their expansion during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. Con: However, his prioritization of profits over labor rights, including exploiting workers, undermined trust in wealthy industrialists and the broader capitalist system.

Henry Ford

Henry Ford

Pro: Ford’s $5 workday improved workers’ living standards, set a precedent for fair wages, and laid the foundation for the middle class we see today. His innovations spurred related industries, created thousands of jobs, and made consumer goods affordable, shaping the modern economy. Con: Ford segregated African American workers into low-paying jobs and published anti-Semitic propaganda, tarnishing his legacy.

Adam Smith

Adam Smith

Pro: Adam Smith’s ideas, like the division of labor and the "invisible hand," show that self-interest in free markets boosts efficiency. Good or bad, this philosophy remains influential today—if the pie keeps growing, everyone gets a slice, driving industrialization and business. Con: Although Smith acknowledged disparities, he didn’t delve deeply into the potential for unchecked capitalism to exacerbate wealth gaps and social inequality.

John D. Rockefeller

John D. Rockefeller

Pro: Rockefeller’s vertically integrated oil model, controlling every stage from extraction to distribution, shaped modern corporate practices. Later, he donated the equivalent of over $14 billion to education, science, and public health, with his foundation focusing on long-term global challenges like food security, health, and climate change. Con: Rockefeller’s unethical practices, like bribery of politicians and price-fixing, eliminated competition and gave him undue influence, while his oil empire contributed to pollution and resource depletion.

Living from Heart

Living from Heart

Pro: Living authentically can help you discover your true purpose in life, leading to more intentional and meaningful actions. Con: Acting based on emotions and feelings can sometimes lead to impulsive decisions that may not be practical or well thought out.

Thomas Edison

Thomas Edison

• Pro: Edison's invention of the electric light bulb revolutionized daily life, enabling people to extend their activities beyond daylight hours and transforming work, leisure, and safety. • Con: Critics contend that Edison often took sole credit for inventions developed collaboratively, benefiting significantly from the creativity and efforts of his employees and collaborators